docs(eso): Phase 1 done (0.16.2) + confirmed Phase 2 GC findings
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/default Pipeline was successful

Execution log added to the ESO migration plan. Phase 1 complete: ESO at 0.16.2
(both v1beta1+v1 served). Phase 2 findings confirmed live: apiVersion bump forces
a kubernetes_manifest REPLACE, and ESO ESs use creationPolicy=Owner (target Secret
ownerRef → cascade-GC risk on the replace's delete). Phase 2 must snapshot Secrets
+ empirically validate GC-survival on the first live ES + per-stack two-phase
-target apply (fallback: state rm + import). Corrected the doc's k8s assumption
(cluster is on 1.34; whole climb stays on 1.34, no interleave).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viktor Barzin 2026-06-21 20:44:50 +00:00
parent ac27e41fde
commit 1a32c07ffe

View file

@ -3,6 +3,13 @@
> **Status:** DESIGN / not yet executed (2026-06-21).
> **Scope:** Upgrade the ESO Helm chart `0.12.1` (app `v0.12.1`) to `2.6.0` (app `v2.6.0`) and migrate every `external-secrets.io/v1beta1` custom resource to `external-secrets.io/v1`.
> **Owner:** Viktor Barzin. **Author:** Claude (research + design only — no changes applied).
>
> **EXECUTION CORRECTION + STATUS (2026-06-21 — "let's do the ESO migration"):** The cluster is already on **k8s 1.34.9** (all 7 nodes), NOT ≤1.31 as §4.3 assumed. ESO 0.12 runs fine on 1.34 (the support-matrix bands are conservative *tested* ranges, not hard limits). **The entire ESO climb 0.12→2.6 therefore happens on k8s 1.34 — there is NO k8s interleave; IGNORE the "advance k8s to 1.32/1.33" steps in §4.3 / Phase 1 / Phase 3.** Only AFTER ESO reaches 2.x does the nightly version-check chain take k8s 1.34→1.35 (gate clears). Exact hop sequence (latest patch per minor): **0.13.0 → 0.14.4 → 0.15.1 → 0.16.2** [rewrite all 104 CRs to `v1` here] → **0.17.0 → 0.18.2 → 0.19.2 → 0.20.4 → 1.0.0 → 1.1.1 → 1.2.1 → 1.3.2 → 2.0.1 → 2.1.0 → 2.2.0 → 2.3.0 → 2.4.1 → 2.5.0 → 2.6.0**. Pre-flight done: CRD `storedVersions` are `["v1beta1"]` only (no v1alpha1 patch needed).
>
> **EXECUTION LOG:**
> - **✅ Phase 1 DONE (2026-06-21):** ESO climbed 0.12.1 → 0.13.0 → 0.14.4 → 0.15.1 → **0.16.2**, one hop at a time, each applied + verified (controller healthy; 108 live ExternalSecrets stayed SecretSynced; 2 pre-existing dead — `instagram-poster/instagram-poster-secrets` False since 2026-05-10, `payslip-ingest/payslip-ingest-secrets` False since 2026-04-25, both missing Vault data, untouched). Added `atomic=true` + `timeout=600` to the helm_release. At 0.16.2 **both `v1beta1` and `v1` are served** (110 each) and `storedVersions = ["v1beta1","v1"]`. Committed (`eso: Phase 1 …`); state auto-committed per hop by `scripts/tg`.
> - **⏳ Phase 2 PENDING — findings confirmed (decisive for execution):** (a) bumping a `kubernetes_manifest` ExternalSecret's apiVersion v1beta1→v1 **forces a REPLACE** (verified live on instagram-poster: `-/+ must be replaced`), NOT in-place. (b) Our ExternalSecrets use **`creationPolicy=Owner`** (default; confirmed on nextcloud) → target Secrets carry an ownerReference, so the replace's delete step can **cascade-GC the Secret** before ESO recreates it. → **Phase 2 must be done carefully, NOT a blind bulk apply:** (1) snapshot ALL target Secrets first (backstop); (2) **empirically validate on the FIRST live stack** — migrate one ES while watching its target Secret; ESO re-syncs the identical spec fast and should re-adopt before GC, but confirm before proceeding; (3) then the per-stack two-phase `-target`-then-full apply (the 15 plan-time-coupled stacks need `-target` first). If validation shows GC wins, pivot to `state rm` + `import {}` (adopts the already-v1-served object with zero delete → zero GC). Repo is clean at v1beta1 (the lone test edit was reverted, never applied).
> - **Phase 3 PENDING:** hops 0.17.0 → 0.18.2 → 0.19.2 → 0.20.4 → 1.0.0 → 1.1.1 → 1.2.1 → 1.3.2 → 2.0.1 → 2.1.0 → 2.2.0 → 2.3.0 → 2.4.1 → 2.5.0 → 2.6.0 (all on k8s 1.34, CRs already v1). Crossing **0.17 is the point of no return**.
---