fan-control: power-tune COOL curve to the 60% efficiency knee
Power/temp sweep (2026-06-05) located the cooling-per-watt knee at ~60%: 60->70% buys only -2C for +21W, and 70->100% buys 0C for +54W (the CPU floors ~59C at cluster load, so more airflow does nothing). Re-tune the COOL curve to cap its normal band at 60% (~303W, ~61C); 80/100% become a high-load safety ramp (>=73/79C) before the 83C ceiling. QUIET unchanged (already at the 281W / 4800rpm floor). Saves up to ~75W (~650 kWh/yr) vs full-tilt for the last ~2C. Tests + design doc updated; verified live (63C, 60%, ~267W). [ci skip] Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17da37cea3
commit
99f9bf8d89
3 changed files with 54 additions and 24 deletions
|
|
@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ set -uo pipefail
|
|||
: "${RUN_ONCE:=0}" # 1 => one iteration then exit (testing)
|
||||
|
||||
# Curves as "min_temp:pct" entries, descending; first whose min_temp <= temp wins.
|
||||
COOL_CURVE=(74:100 68:85 61:65 53:45 0:25)
|
||||
# COOL is power-tuned (2026-06-05 power/temp sweep): the cooling-per-watt knee is
|
||||
# ~60% — beyond it airflow buys almost nothing (60->70% = +21W/-2°C, 70->100% =
|
||||
# +54W/0°C; the CPU floors ~59°C at cluster load). So the normal band caps at 60%
|
||||
# (~303W, ~61°C); 80/100% are a high-load safety ramp before the 83°C ceiling.
|
||||
COOL_CURVE=(79:100 73:80 64:60 55:50 0:30)
|
||||
QUIET_CURVE=(82:100 78:65 73:40 0:20)
|
||||
|
||||
log() { printf '%s %s\n' "$(date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z')" "$*"; }
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue