docs(architecture): fix stale 5-node claim -> 7 nodes (k8s-node1..6) [ci skip]
Cluster grew to 7 nodes (k8s-master + node1..6; node5/6 added ~10d ago) but several docs still said "5 nodes". Corrected with live specs: - overview.md: 7-node enumeration; node1 is 16c/48GB (doc wrongly said 32GB), node2-6 are 8c/32GB general workers - compute.md: "5-node" -> "7-node" cluster description - dns.md: NodeLocal DNSCache DaemonSet "5 nodes" -> "7 nodes" - mailserver.md: HAProxy backend diagram "node1..4" -> "node1..6" Illustrative "0/5 nodes available" scheduler-error examples left as-is. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf3608052b
commit
c24b4a21d8
4 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
The infrastructure runs on a single Dell R730 server with Proxmox VE, hosting a 5-node Kubernetes cluster. Compute resources are managed through a combination of Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) recommendations, tier-based LimitRange defaults, and ResourceQuota enforcement. The cluster employs a no-CPU-limits policy to avoid CFS throttling while using memory requests=limits for stability. GPU workloads run on a dedicated node with Tesla T4 passthrough.
|
||||
The infrastructure runs on a single Dell R730 server with Proxmox VE, hosting a 7-node Kubernetes cluster. Compute resources are managed through a combination of Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) recommendations, tier-based LimitRange defaults, and ResourceQuota enforcement. The cluster employs a no-CPU-limits policy to avoid CFS throttling while using memory requests=limits for stability. GPU workloads run on a dedicated node with Tesla T4 passthrough.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue