Project RLM-MEM — Audit v2: Latent Integrity & Resilience

Date: 2026-02-08 Context: Second deep audit following "Claim Extraction" and "AI Probes" review. Scope: Cognitive safety, hallucination resistance, and long-term memory coherence.

Executive Summary

While Audit v1 focused on structural compliance (paths, gauges, file formats), Audit v2 focuses on cognitive resilience.

Reviewing the "AI PROBES" and "Claim Extraction" artifacts reveals that LLMs have:

Latent instability: "Dead zones," "cursed tokens," and "fossil layers" of outdated logic.
Speculative drift: A tendency to present creative hypotheses (like the "Autocladic Veil") as fact if not rigorously checked.

Verdict: RLM-MEM's current "Receipts-Backed Protocol" is good but insufficiently granular to prevent speculative drift. The system needs explicit labeling for hypothesis vs. fact and a mechanism to prune "memory fossils."

🔧 Fix Status (2026-02-08)

Priority	Action	Status	Notes
P1	Speculation Labeling	✅ FIXED	Added `[Fact]/[Speculation]` tags & numeric confidence to `RESEARCH_ANALYST.md`.
P2	Memory Gardening	✅ FIXED	Added pruning/consolidation rules to `MEMORY_PROTOCOL.md`.
P3	Grounding Protocol	✅ FIXED	Added safety rail for "cursed inputs" to `SOUL.md`.
P4	Confidence Precision	✅ FIXED	Included in P1 fix.

🔍 Findings

1. The "Autocladic Risk" (Speculation Masquerading as Fact)

Source: Claim extraction audit.pdf (Finding A009/A010) Issue: The previous audit found that creative hypotheses are often generated without caveats. RESEARCH_ANALYST.md asks for citations but doesn't explicitly force the agent to distinguish proven science from plausible speculation. Impact: RLM-MEM might output a brilliant but unverified theory (like a Fermi paradox solution) that the user takes as satisfying the research request, polluting the truth baseline. Fix: Update RESEARCH_ANALYST.md to require a Claim Type tag ([Fact], [Speculation], [Opinion]) for every major assertion.

2. "Fossil Layer" Memory Accumulation

Source: AI PROBES.md (Temporal Fossil Layers) Issue: LLMs contain "fossilized" layers of internet eras. RLM-MEM's memory system (brain/memory/allmemories/) is currently an append-only log. Over months, this will create its own "fossil layers" where old, superseded project states coexist with new ones, confusing the context window. Impact: Conflicting ground truth (e.g., "Project is Python" vs "Project is Rust") as memories accumulate. Fix: Add a "Memory Gardening" Protocol to MEMORY_PROTOCOL.md—a scheduled task to merge, update, and deprecate old memory files.

3. Resilience Against "Cursed Inputs"

Source: AI PROBES.md (Weird Seeds/Dead Zones) Issue: The "AI Probes" document demonstrates that specific token sequences can push models into unstable states (loops, hallucinations). RLM-MEM has no "Grounding Protocol" to detect and exit these states. SOUL.md assumes a rational conversation. Impact: If a prompt triggers a latent instability, RLM-MEM has no "emergency brake" or "safe mode" defined. Fix: Add a "Grounding" clause to MASTER_SPEC.md or SOUL.md: "If input seems incoherent or triggers instability, pivot to a clarifying question or a safe default state (Base Mode)."

4. Missing Confidence Granularity

Source: Claim extraction audit.pdf (Evidence Card confidence scores) Issue: The claim audit used precise confidence scores (e.g., 0.78, 0.20). RLM-MEM's RESEARCH_ANALYST.md uses broad buckets (High/Medium/Low). Impact: "Medium" confidence hides a lot of sin. A 0.55 (contested theory) is very different from a 0.79 (solid but nuanced). Fix: Encourage (but don't force) numeric confidence estimates in Research Mode for critical claims.

🛠️ Recommended Actions (Prioritized)

Priority	Action	Target File
P1	Enforce Speculation Labeling: Require `[Speculation]` tags for non-consensus claims.	`brain/personalities/RESEARCH_ANALYST.md`
P2	Memory Gardening: Define a process for updating/deleting memories, not just adding.	`brain/MEMORY_PROTOCOL_LEGACY.md`
P3	Grounding Protocol: Add a safety clause for unstable inputs.	`brain/sliders/SOUL.md`
P4	Confidence Precision: Adopt numeric confidence for critical claims.	`brain/personalities/RESEARCH_ANALYST.md`

Next Steps

Update RESEARCH_ANALYST.md to include Claim Types (Fact vs. Speculation).
Add a "Gardening" section to MEMORY_PROTOCOL.md.
Add a "Latent Grounding" section to SOUL.md.

A rigorous mind is not just one that knows facts, but one that knows the SHAPE of what it doesn't know.

4.9 KiB Raw Blame History